Speedy Gonzalez Target Reading Photos
In the Speedy Gonzalez show episode 220 Speedy talks about diagnosing problems in load development based on what your groups are doing. below you will find the target pictures and the official benchrest target.
For the serious long range shooter
Background:
Back in January of this year I started on a journey outfitting a 16-foot positive buoyancy boat for what I intended to be a grand adventure with my 7-year-old daughter. We would leave Washington State head up the inside passage of Canada and finish in Juneau Alaska. Well, as we say in our family “COVID ruins everything”. Even as I write this the Canadian border remains closed. Patrolled by not only Canadian border protection and Coastguard but also a brigade of concerned citizens that report suspicious boat activity to the aforementioned entities. So, the trip is on hold for now, but the boat is ready.
Based on my previous boating experience (over 8 years in Alaska on vessels of all sizes) I knew it would be quite wearing to listen to the drone of an outboard motor for all 1000 miles. Additionally, understanding the spongelike nature of a 7-year-old’s mind and the endless things to look at and talk about on the way up, I knew it would be essential for us to have a solid means of communication over the noise of the outboard. When running solo or with minimal conversation in a weathertight cabin I have enjoyed using my Bose headset with active noise cancelation. But I knew my needs would be a little different for this trip.
My requirements:
I would need something way more water-resistant since we would be exposed to the elements on 3 sides. I also knew I would need something with a good microphone that wouldn’t pick up too much of the motor noise while talking. The final feature that was a must for me was the ability to turn off the ambient noise receiver/talk-through, but still use the audio in and microphone. Other considerations were comfort across all head sizes and usefulness in other activities.
Enter OTTO:
In my search for a headset that would meet all my criteria, I created a pretty short list. On that list were some top tier headsets. However, all but one were missing one element or another. The headset that checked all my boxes was the NoizeBarrier® TAC OTTO Engineering. If you are not familiar with the company don’t feel bad, neither was I, but they had all the specs I was looking for. The more I looked into them the more I realized why I hadn’t heard of them or come across their product in the field. They don’t do a lot of marketing like sponsoring pro-shooters or big competitions. They very rarely buy ad space in the gun magazines. Lastly, they don’t release a new over-hyped product every year and claim it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. They simply make products for professionals who use them in demanding situations.
A quick authors note on demanding situations: One piece of gear (headlamp, backpack, firearm, comms system, ect.) is just as good as another... until it has to be, then it isn’t, and it is at that point you see what the extra dollars bought you…..reliability in the harshest conditions.
OTTO’s product specs and list of customers in military and law enforcement speak volumes, however, I also like to know the culture of the company I am dealing with. There is nothing worse than having a piece of kit fail (invariably when you need it the most) and later calling into “customer service” to be put on hold for 20 minutes just to have a sales rep., who doesn’t know any more about the product than what their catalog says, tell you your problem was a result of user error and may or may not be covered by warranty. OTTO was very easy to deal with. I was able to get a real person on the phone right away. That person was very familiar with the OTTO product line, and as soon as I had a technical question I was put in touch with an engineer who could answer it for me. Their staff seemed to be not only knowledgeable but also energetic, hard-working, and loyal.
Time on the water:
Due to a brief pause in their manufacturing, Otto was not able to initially provide me with a permanent set of the NoizeBarrier® TAC, but they were able to send out a demo pair for a month. In that month I was able to plug them into my RRP 242 intercom from Rugged Radios, using the Nato to XLR 5 pin cables rugged radios supplied. With those items, the system functioned exactly as intended. We took them out numerous times over the month. The NoizeBarrier® TACs were comfortable enough to wear on prolonged outings. They were adjustable enough to fit my daughter’s head or my L/XL ballcap sized noggin. The battery life was excellent and the sound quality was clear. For a sample of what they sound like check out this link: http://www.precisionriflemedia.com/prgr/2020/8/26/prgr-005-mpa-matrix-chassis
At the Range:
I also wore the NoizeBarrier® TACswhile teaching 2 CCW classes (I tucked the downlead in my polo shirt so as to not give off too much of that “tacticool” vibe). It was during the first class I came to appreciate the quality of OTTO’s talk-through system. It made having conversations easy because it shut off and came back on so quickly I did not experience any conversation “clipping” even with gunfire around me.
Conclusion:
Based on my month using the NoizeBarrier® TAC I am very satisfied. They did everything I asked them to without fail. A month was not long enough, under the conditions in which I was using them, to make a hard statement about durability or ruggedness. I can say with certainty, however, I saw no obvious points of failure and suspect this headset would last many years in my application. I look forward to getting a permanent set and will post updates as I have more time with them in various conditions.
Extra Credit:
You don’t have to read this section to get my take on the performance of the NoizeBarrier® TAC headsets, I covered all that above, but if you want to hear a little more of what Otto is all about as a company then read on.
After my evaluation period, I arranged a time to speak with OTTO’s President Tom Roeser. For being the president of a 450+ person company he was surprisingly personable and humble. We covered a lot, but one quote really stuck with me, “Culture beats strategy”. OTTO has a culture of improvement. They improve on the products available to the end user. They have improved the physical infrastructure of their community by renovating an old liquor store and turning it into a beautiful headquarters and buying foreclosed homes and renovating those for employee housing. Finally, they improve the lives of those associated with the company. They support youth through an apprentice program and they support their employees through a profit sharing program (Cash bonuses are given every 6 months usually equating to an extra 3 weeks of pay.) Finally, OTTO employees even support those in need in their community through bell ringing with the Salvation Army. There are enough examples a guy could write a term paper about OTTO’s achievements, but in the interest of brevity I will simply say this, OTTO is in the business of making things better and in doing so they have embodied the American success story.
Garrett Gee
2/6/17
Choosing an action or rifle can arguably, be the single most difficult decision a shooter can make. The other difficult choice is that of choosing an optic, which will be covered another time. Breaking this choice down even further is choosing an action, hence the title. This isn’t meant to be a versus article or a review but more a comparison, looking at the pros and cons of each. Here I will focus primarily on the short action variety as they are most often used for competition. Choosing an action is very much a personal preference. My aim is to give you some insight into how I made that choice and some considerations when you choose yours.
Pattern
For the most part there are only two choices when choosing which “pattern” action you’d like to choose. That of the 700 or it’s clones or an AI pattern. Some companies such as Badger Ordnance or American Rifle Co. have attempted to blend several different models of action with varying degrees of success.
700 “Clones”
The two most popular models of 700 pattern custom actions are the Defiance Deviant and Surgeon 591. There are many other actions out there but these two are the most popular custom actions on the precision rifle circuit right now. I have owned both and both are stellar actions. The Deviants are more blocky in their shape and thus feel a bit more robust, while the Surgeon 591 is rather traditional looking with exception to the bolt design. The largest benefit of the 700 pattern custom actions is that the list of aftermarket parts and accessories is seemingly endless. For example, an individual can choose a Manners or McMillan stock if they feel they like the look and feel of the traditional style stocks. They can choose any number of chassis systems if the shooter wants more adjustability out of the stock. If the shooter wants the look of an AI rifle but likes the feel of the Surgeon 591 or Deviant actions, AI has a chassis that the barreled action can be dropped into. If the shooter wants the look of an M2010 rifle, Cadex makes a chassis for that.
Accuracy International AT/AX
The AT/AX action is essentially an AW action with a quick change barrel options. The quick change barrel allows for caliber swaps on the short action rifles to occur in about 1 minute with only one tool. This is a huge benefit for those who run hot loads and run the risk of piercing primers. For me the benefit is being able to have a practice 6.5 Creedmoor barrel and a competition 6.5 Creedmoor barrel that can be quickly swapped out. I also have a .308 barrel that can be used for cheap practice or deer hunting should I choose. Now barrel changes can be done at home with 700 pattern actions though it is a little more time consuming and involved but totally doable.
Another benefit of the AT/AX action is it’s durability. This action is not designed for the competition, it was designed primarily as a sniper rifle intended for the battlefield. It’s design has translated well for competition use but that is coincidence more than design in my opinion. The AI action is designed to take a beating and work in every environment imaginable. I shoot in a place known for bitter cold winters and a team that prides itself on being “Kings of the North”. I’ve shot my AT in sub-zero degree weather with zero sluggishness in the bolt cycle or trigger issues. Both of my Deviants had some bolt sluggishness, though I think that could possibly be remedied by switching to a different grease.
Stocks/Chassis
“700 Clones”
As mentioned above there are endless possibilities for which stock or chassis your custom action can ride in. The list includes but is not limited to:
Manners
McMillan
MDT
McCrees
Accuracy International
Cadex
MPA
Even Desert Tech has a prototype for a 700 pattern chassis that has made an appearance at SHOT show for a couple of years.
The only downside to this, is that to use some of these stock or chassis, they may or may not need to be inlet for your specific action.
Accuracy International AT/AX
There are really only two chassis options for the Accuracy International pattern rifles. The AT rifles come with a AW style stock that has a pistol grip, though there's a “thumbhole” skin set available for the AI AT chassis. The cheek piece and but stock adjusts much like traditional style stocks. There are mounting capabilities on the stock for accessories at the 3, 6 and 9 positions as well as the ability to mount an NVD rail to the top of the stock if needed.
The AX chassis is on a whole different level itself. Rather than a traditional style forend AI opted for a shorter front grip and a long fore end tube that has their proprietary key slot adapters that can be added to mount accessories such as bipods, range finders and red dots. The top of the tube can be modified with a full length 20 MOA night vision rail that aligns with the 20 MOA optic rail on the action. The butt stock is full adjustable for comb height, length of pull and shoulder pocket angle. The stock also folds to the right capturing the bolt for a small signature.
Bolts
The biggest difference between the two is that the 700 clones use a 90* bolt throw while Accuracy International actions use a 60* I like the 60* better due to its speed but the bolt does get hung up on clothing a little bit easier than the 90* bolts on the 700 clones.
The 700 clones are slightly easier on the bolt lift as well, though the difference is hard to pick up. The AI bolts are extremely easy and require no tools to disassemble which is a nice bonus. The AI’s also have a 3 position safety on the bolt as well.
Magazines
Both types of action accept the nearly universally accepted AI pattern magazines. Though the AT and AX run on AW and AX magazines whereas the 700 pattern clones tend to run best on the AICS pattern AI mags. Though some actions are cut for AW mags, I have had feeding issues in both of my Deviant actions running the AW pattern magazines.
Triggers
700 Clones
As with stocks, the options for triggers is endless for the 700 clone actions. Timney seems to be the most popular. However, Jewel and Huber Concepts triggers are also extremely popular.
Accuracy International AT/AX
The AT and AX rifles use Accuracy International’s 2 stage drop in trigger. The plus side to this trigger is that it is extremely robust and has a great pull weight and feel. The downside to it is that only an AI certified armorer should be working on the weight adjustments. However the trigger shoe position is user adjustable.
At the end of the day I went with the AI AX. It matched what I needed in a rifle. My shooting partner and girlfriend prefers the 700 clone actions. The choice is totally personal and comes down to what type of features the shooter is looking for. I hope this helps you make yours.
Review
Custom AI Bipod Mount
Manufactured by Sam Burns
I was at the WPRSC match back in May with my AI AT rifle when Sam approached me and started asking me about bipods. I assumed it was because I looked OAF in my multicam and Arc’Teryx gear but in reality he was talking to me only because we both shoot AI rifles and he had a bipod mount that would make life much easier for me. Sam showed me his custom bipod mount and I was hooked.
I bought a mount and it arrived at my house after that batch of mounts was completed, Sam only sells them in batches by the way so get on the list. I quickly removed the old mount from the chassis which is done by unscrewing the flush cup mounts and punching out the roll pins. I slid the new mounting block into the chassis, replaced the roll pins and screwed the flush cups back into place. Sam includes an entire set of detailed installation instructions, just in case you’re like me and better at running an XBox controller than a power tool.
A couple of nice things about the mount:
1) It’s has a 1913 rail system allowing for the use of an QD or Clamp style mount.
2) It moves the bipod forward by an inch or two
I’ve had the mount out to the range a handful of times and every time I’m impressed by the mount. The extended front section of the rail allows me to get the bipod out in front of rifle providing for more balance. For barricade shooting I can adjust the Atlas legs to a 45* angle facing rearward and it will give me the entire handguard to use as a balance point for the rifle.
One other thing that I really liked about the mount is that it keeps everything fairly low profiled. Unlike using the bipod stud, I can easily fit the strap of my Rifles Only bag over the bipod and mount. This is also a huge advantage when shooting off barricades or even rooftop stages.
All in all the mount is an obvious upgrade to the AI platform over the standard spigot mount. The fact that I can use any bipod with picatinny adapter makes it worthwhile. I’d definitely recommend it to the AI owners out there.
Written by Garrett Gee
In my last optic review of the Burris 5-25 XTR II I mentioned that I would be doing a review of the XTR II in the 2-10 variety come late summer. It’s now late summer/early fall, but unfortunately I was unable to acquire the 2-10 XTR II. The XTR line of optics has become very popular, and even after ramping up production significantly Burris has been unable to keep shelves fully stocked.
My hope was to test the 2-10 on my match carbine to see if it would fit the bill as far as having a great all-around optic for the AR15, especially for team matches in which a carbine is required. Since Burris was unable to provide the 2-10, I was offered the 3-15 XTR II to try instead. The more I thought about it, the more I thought the 3-15 could fill that role, so I decided to give it a try and use it during some team matches I competed in this summer.
As with the 5-25 version of the XTR II, I had a great first impression when I unboxed the unit. The design stays true to the entire line and has a great look. It’s classic satin black finish and has the tactical feel and function one would expect from this type of optic. Great turret size, tactile/audible clicks, and legible font all add up to a great interface between the shooter and the optic.
This flavor of 3-15 came with the SCR (Special Competition Reticle) just like my 5-25 has. I am very accustomed to this reticle and the only reticle I may favor over this would be a Horus Christmas-tree style. The SCR is so quick to hold wind with using its two tenth increments on alternating sides of the stadia. The optic is a first focal plane design, but the reticle always seems to be the correct size/thickness as the magnification is increased or decreased.
One thing that I realized immediately is that the glass seemed to be clearer than in my 5-25. I believe this is because the 5-25 has to stretch out that much harder using similar components. The 3-15 just doesn’t have to work as hard to achieve its 15x magnification. This all could be an illusion, but it’s hard to compare when the 5-25 seems to darken a bit when getting to that higher range of magnification and the 3-15 does not.
I used the scope in the US Optics team challenge in Douglas, Wyoming. The scope worked rather well in this setting, especially attached to the top of the carbine rig. In the rules we were not allowed to have more than one optic attached to the carbine, and at times we had to engage targets rather close in “assault stages”, so getting all the way down to 3x was helpful in those situations. While not as quick as a 1x or 2x, it was still plenty useful and I was able to shoot off-hand and score “A” zone hits in the eye box of IPSC cardboard silhouettes rather easily.
The scope was not babied by any stretch of the imagination. I don’t abuse my equipment, but the AR15 rig was tossed around quite a bit from the day I mounted the optic. Running in the truck with me day to day at work before the matches, during the matches themselves, and getting dropped and carried on a sling during running and plenty of movement- the scope didn’t ever lose its zero. I think that’s one of the most important aspects of an optic. Even if you can only afford lower quality glass, are borrowing a rifle, or simply don’t know better-you can still get work done if you are a decent/consistent shooter and your scope zero is not shifting around on you.
At distance the optic performed great. During the team match at the Whittington Center for the Sporting Rifle Match, I made hits on steel at 700 yards firing the .223 cartridge. While sometimes it would be nice to reach out a little further than 15x, it wasn’t a make or break problem to have as the hits were possible. I could still see all I needed to see.
A friend of mine who was my partner for the Raton team match used my carbine with the XTR II attached for the entire day. He seemed to only have a couple of complaints. One which was the ocular lens was not adjusted for his eyes. This could have been remedied, but he was a quick alternate replacement as my original team mate had become ill the night before the match. I wasn’t sure if ocular lens adjustment could shift zero, so we made due with where it was already adjusted and he seemed to shoot just fine. His other complaint was that the serrations on the turrets were sharp to the point he though they may cut his hands. I had mentioned this in my review of the 5-25, but that was sort of subjective since I often had worn gloves to shoot, and I like having a solid purchase on the turret knobs. Some companies simply have a coin-edge type machining that is difficult to grip to turn the turret or just feels slippery. So, this may be a point for you to consider if you are optic shopping. If you have thicker or calloused skin, it may be no issue at all.
Burris was also kind enough to send me a PEPR AR15 height mount for the optic and I decided to use it. This worked out great because it allowed me to use a standard AR15 stock without any kind of cheek riser to get a good sight picture. The AR15 I was using was a side-charging style, so I didn’t have to worry about charging handle clearance. But this may be something you need to consider while setting up your rig. At the very least you may need a charging handle with and extended latch to get your hand away from the ocular end of the optic. I was using Magpul’s CTR stock and it worked perfectly.
Overall I honestly feel this 3-15 XTR II may have been the better option over the 2-10 for the testing we were doing. While I believe hits can absolutely be made at further distances with a 10x optic, it may not be as quick as using the 15x at full magnification. Firing a carbine past 600 yards will require you to be able to spot splashes and misses for corrections. First round hits out that far may be pretty rare, at least with the .223 cartridge. The extra stretch in the 3-15 did that well and I was impressed with its performance.
I urge anyone shopping for a carbine optic, or even an optic for their precision rig that requires a smaller package, to look at the 3-15 XTR II as an option. Burris has really stepped up to the plate with this line of scopes, and the ultra-high demand for these models tells me I’m not the only one who thinks so.
Written by Justin Willhite
Aside from accurate range, the other most pertinent information a precision rifle shooter can have is accurate environmental data. In days past, shooters had to rely mostly on handwritten data books in which their DOPE was kept with references to various weather conditions. Also, the shooters had to be able to read wind cues from nature to estimate wind direction and velocity. The technology just did not exist to make real-time ballistic calculations for firing solutions. That is, until the digital age arrived and the possibilities for access to ballistics data became nearly instantaneous to access and increasingly accurate in providing solutions.
So what does this all mean for the modern shooter? If you are seriously looking into getting into the sport of precision rifle shooting as a competitor, or simply as an individual who wishes to improve his marksmanship skills-technology such as a digital ballistics calculator may be an important part of your shooter’s tool box.
After having a ballistic calculator, the next logical thing you need is solid information to feed into that calculator so that you can have a reliable firing solution for your task at hand. The adage goes, “Garbage in, and garbage out.” So, at this point a weather meter that provides the wind’s speed and heading, target heading, as well as density altitude and other attributes would be a handy method to obtain that data. This is where theWeatherFlow WINDmeter and accompanying phone application, BalliscticsARC, come in.
The application is free to download and laid out in a simple and easy to use configuration. The different sections of the program are accessible through tabs on the bottom of the screen, and are self-explanatory. There are sections for Rifle, Weather, Hardware, Map, and Menu.
The user can access the rifle section to input all the pertinent information about his individual rifle and optic, and save that rifle’s profile with in that section so that it can be accessed anytime. It has a decent library of projectiles to choose from if you’ve got a commercial load you’re shooting, or you can customize ballistic coefficients if you hand-load your ammunition. Several rifles can be stored and also accessed.
In the weather section the weather inputs can be put in manually, or imported from the hand-held weather meter which is really handy. The connection between devices is via Bluetooth, so it’s universal for most devices. In my iPhone 6 Plus, I only had to activate Bluetooth. I didn’t have to pair the devices within the phone at all. Just by simply pressing and holding the single button on the wind meter the connection is made directly to the application. I really liked that feature as it can be annoying to go into another settings app to pair devices and using passcodes etc. It just makes the experience quicker and easier.
When the Hardware tab is selected, the app displays all the various readings the meter is capable of detecting, and shows them on the screen in real time. So you can just observe the data in that state, or there is a “capture” option that takes a sample of the data to feed it into the calculator for your firing solution range card. The capture can also be taken over a period of time to try to capture an average on wind variables.
The range card information is concise and easy to read. You can input the increments in yardages that you wish to be displayed. The data displayed is derived from the JBM ballistics calculator, which in my experience has been proven in other applications that I and friends have been using for quite some time. During the time I used the meter/app setup, it was accurate to my standards of accuracy and within one tenth of a mil of the other app calculator that I had been using before, which is Ballistic AE. Ballistic AE also uses the JBM calculator so that’s not too surprising.
Another feature in the setup that I think is a neat idea is the rangefinder. This is accomplished by utilizing the location services of the phone or device you are using your application on. So this feature is only going to be as accurate as the GPS functions in your device. The mapping section shows your location on a satellite picture/map much like in a Google Maps application. You then put yourself at the target, or drop your pin where the target is on the satellite picture and the app estimates your range. At this time I do not believe this will be as accurate as a good laser range finder, but if you have no other method it’s a useful feature.
The application itself could stand alone from the meter as simply a ballistics solver if you wanted to input data points manually, but seems to be more of a seamless user experience if the meter is used in conjunction with your phone or tablet. Also, the application gives you the option to utilize the sensors (like the compass) in your device running the BallisticsARC app since its possible those sensors may have better resolution than the Weatherflow meter. This makes sense if GeoBallistics is trying to save money producing the meters with sensors that aren’t as powerful as in your $600 phone.
The Weatherflow meter itself is rather small as it has no digital displays or extra switches. It has a single rubber-protected button, and only houses the sensors and Bluetooth radio to communicate with other devices. This makes the device extremely easy to pack and use. The outer shell of the unit has grippy feeling rubber coating that makes it feel robust even though it is so lightweight. It’s easy to throw into your pants pocket, or to even lash to the outside of your pack until it’s needed again.
The meter comes with extra attachments depending on how you want to use/carry the unit. One is an eyelet that one could tie a lanyard or necklace to for safe keeping. The other is shaped like a headphone jack so the unit can stick straight into your phone or tablet and you can hold them both as one unit. I found that with the iPhone 6 plus already being large, it was difficult to operate one-handed. I would typically raise one hand holding the meter to gather data, and hold my phone in the other to observe the data and charts.
I feel the unit definitely has a place in the market for new shooters to the sport who are looking to learn how to shoot and don’t have so much cash to spend on competing products that cost many times over what this tool does. At the time of this writing, the weather meter can be had online for about $84.95, which is more than tempting when some of the competition can range from the $400-$700.
Even seasoned and experienced shooters may look to this unit as a backup to their main meter, or as an extra unit to loan to friends. If you’re out with a new shooter who is learning it may be beneficial for them to download the free application to their own phone and take data from the borrowed meter. I know some old school shooters who only want to use hand written or printed data cards that are referenced to density altitude. If for nothing else, this meter can be used to gather just density altitude quickly and accurately so the correct range card can be chosen.
The bottom line is that the unit costs less than it probably should, and that makes it even harder to have any complaints about the setup, of which I really have none. I find it difficult to nit-pick something as useful and low cost as the WeatherFLOW meter. The GeoBallistics setup fulfilled and actually exceeded my expectations of a $84.95 tool.
If you’re looking for a calculator/meter that has several extra variables to run such as cross wind jump and more complicated variables used by more experienced shooters this may not be the unit for you. But as I said before, you may be a fool not to pick one of these up as a plan B, or as a teaching tool for others.
Glass.It’s a single word term to embody all of the attributes of the modern sporting optic. Binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, and occasionally rangefinders all fall into this category and everyone just has to know, “Hey, how’s the glass in that thing?”Having spent a considerable amount of time behind the Burris XTR II 5-25 rifle scope I can say,“Not bad. Not bad at all.”
If you’ve been considering buying a precision riflescope in the $1500 range, you may very well be looking at the Burris XTR II line to fulfill your needs. In regards to precision rifle shooting, the XTR II line has quite a line-up of features that will appeal to the discerning trigger puller.
With so many manufacturers getting in on the action with the tactical/precision shooting game it can be difficult to decide which direction to go in when it comes time to spend one’s hard-earned cash. Some have bigger budgets than others and may not be considering optics in this class and price range, but spending more money may not necessarily get you what you’re paying for. I feel the mission of Burris was to fill the gap between lower end budget optics and the highest end scopes on the market and simultaneously compete for the coveted slot of being the best bang for the buck.
It’s been nearly a year since I purchased this particular model, and I feel I’ve had enough time behind the riflescope to make an informed opinion about the functionality and the quality of the optic and I’d like to share that experience with the precision rifle community.
First Impressions
The scope came new in the box. It was well packaged in a glossy box with all of the pertinent information as to what model it is and the unit was well-protected and nestled in tightly cut-to-fit grey foam. Included were the manual, a sunshade extension, dust covers, and the optic itself- everything wrapped in clear plastic.
The XTR II 5-25optic has that certainlook; the look that everyone wants to have on their competition rig or tactical rifle. It’s a sinister tactical look and feel that while exuding the image of the “real deal”, it’s not just a façade. It still has the engineering, build, and design to back up what you are taking in at first sight. Back in my days of racing street cars and spending money on horsepower I had a friend who said, “You know, that Z28 looks like it could kick your ass, but that Trans Am looks like it’s on the way over to do it!” The 5-25 XTR II by Burris reminds me of that black Trans Am he was so impressed with.
The optic and matching sunshade are finished in a soft satin. Soft enough you don’t feel thattexture with your fingers andone will not see any glares or reflective edges on the tube or the flared bell-ends. The 34mm tube gives the optic some of the look of “heft” as well as some functionality transmitting more light than smaller tubes available in other lines. The broad tube coupled with my chosen NEAR Manufacturing Alpha Mount makes the whole combination look, and actually become, more robust. The turret knobs protruding from the tube are bold and striking. The font chosen by Burris to print the mil references on the knob perimeter is modern, attractive, high contrast, and most importantly extremely easy see at a glance and read clearly even from a couple of steps away from the rifle.
As a competitive rifle shooter, there are certain features that I look for in a riflescope. For instance, immediately I know the optic has a great magnification range. Targets in this game are getting smaller and further away every year. Being able to see what you’re shooting at, and being able to make it large enough in your view to hold your precise wind call is important. What are some other features I and other competitors like me are interested in seeing on prospective optics? Let’s run it down.
Turrets
The turret knobs are large, but they aren’t over-imposing. They have a nice diameter to them so that you can afford a good purchase on them with your thumb and index finger. They are also tall, but not too tall or as overly tall as I feel some other European manufactures have designed theirs to be.
One thing about the turrets that I have really been impressed with and have grown accustomed to is the feel of the texture machined into them. The texture isn’t a knurling, or even a coin-edge machining. It’s what I would call a sharp-edged “scallop” cut.Recently I was competing in Oklahoma at the Shoot for the Green. It was two great days of shooting and there was a great deal of dialing that had to be done along with some quicker hold-over shooting. I noticed that at the end of the day I could actually feel where those scallops had been grabbing the skin of my right hand and actually making it sore. Is that a bad thing? Not in my opinion. That tells me that in any conditions I can manipulate those turrets whether it is wet, dry, oily, or bloody and they will turn when I want them to without any compromise in traction.
It has been my experience that everyone has a personal preference as to how turrets feel, click and move. This makes sense if you think about it. The knobs are the most common means of interfacethe shooter as a person has with the rifle scope tool/machine. Some people like their turrets to glide along smoothly with very little resistance or feedback at every tenth mil or quarter MOA , getting a bit of a “bump” or “thump” at each retention point as they spin. Others prefer their knobs to be much more “clunky” in that it takes more effort to turn the knob due to friction and/or ratchet tension. While I would not characterize the nature of the XTR II turrets to be “clunky”, I would definitely say that they are more on the side of the spectrum with a more positive tactile feel.Let’s just say at the smooth end and “1” being a cheap knock off red-dot optic having barely discernable feedback in the knobs and “10” being what you feel when you overtighten the gas cap on your F150 pickup truck, The XTR II is at a comfortable “7”. The clicks of the turrets “snap” into place when they fall into that tenth increment, and they make an audible sound at each placement. This is the feeling that I prefer. I like the tactile feel so that I can count how many clicks I am from each whole mil number, or half mil number. In this way, I don’t have to actually visually count hash marks getting lost in those little lines. In some ofthe more budget friendly scopes I’ve noticed turrets can vary widely, and most times the knob or turret turns almost freely with little to no feedback for each click of their chosen denomination. These are poorly made riflescopes and I definitely don’t recommend them for the even semi-serious target/tactical shooter.
A shooter wants to be able to dial his DOPE on the elevation knob without making two revolutions for those further pieces of steel, and this 5-25 model delivered, boasting 10 mils of travel per revolution of the knob, and Burris claims 90 MOA of total travel. That means less time turning the knob, and more time with the rifle shouldered and cheek welded to the stock.
I found the zero stop feature of the scope very easy to use. There are no clutches or anything to adjust and removal of the knob or a cap is not required. One simply loosens the two Allan screws that are recessed into the knob, turns the turret to “zero”, pushes the knob in until it bottoms out, and then tightens the screws again. In this way the knob bottoms out on the body of the scope as soon as one reaches zero and the knob simply stops. If for some reason you don’t wish your knob to stop directly on zero, you can raise the knob while the screws are loosened to wherever you please and retighten the screws to maintain that position. It really is that simple.
Reticle
The model tested is equipped with the SCR (Special Competition Reticle) reticle, which is proprietary to Burris. When I first became interested in long range shooting, I much preferred a more simplified reticle with mil-dots or hashes. So, when I first saw the SCR I thought that it looked fairly busy. But within a couple of range sessions of using the optic I became accustomed to the look of the reticle and I prefer it over any other reticle that I’ve used to date.
The floating crosshair is two tenths of a mil wide, making the tips of the crosshair one tenth from the center. The continuation tipsof the stadia beyond the floating crosshair is two tenths from center, making it very easy to do a two tenth wind hold. The graduations after this are staggered marks at each two tenth position making holdovers easy without so much guess work as compared to reticles broken into half mil graduations.
Also, near the outer edges of each stadia, there is a section between the fifth and seventh mil that there are hash marks at each tenth of a mil. This makes it extremely easy to do range estimation of targets if one prefers to range that way. Also, there is a two mil section at the top of the vertical stadia with the same tenth increments so you can mil target height as well. There aren’t many numbers to jumble up the works in the scope. There are only number notations beside each even numbered mil.
There is an illumination feature for the reticle as well. The rheostat knob is located on the shooter’s left side of the optic, on the outside of the parallax adjustment knob. I have found that I would very rarely use this feature, but it’s nice to know it’s there in case I get into a low light situation, or for some reason I have a dark target in front of a dark background. I did have a problem with the functionality of the rheostat switch, but I’ll touch more on that later.
Magnification Ring
Most experienced shooters have their preferences on how a magnification ring should feel when it’s manipulated. Some seem hollow and move too easily. Others seem to be way too greased up and stiff when you want to get a better view. The magnification ring on the 5-25 has a smooth motion to it. It’s not loose and cheap, and it’s not annoyingly stiff. At the time of this writing, Burris does not currently offer a “cat tail” for this model of riflescope. I have affixed a low cost switch view from MGM, and it actually works perfectly for the resistance the magnification ring offers.
Accessories
I had considered a set of aftermarket lens covers before I got the optic, but I found that to be an unnecessary purchase once I handled the XTR II . While lens covers seem to often be an afterthought with today’s optics, the lens covers that came in the box from Burris have actually worked quite well. They aren’t super fancy but are functional. They snap in and out of place with one finger. They’re made of a harder plastic and don’t have a rubbery feel to them. Still, they seem to stay where you put them and they keep a lot of the dust off of the glass. The areas I typically shoot in are very dry and dusty and it hasn’t been a problem yet. They seem to have kept rain and moisture from the glass between stages as well. So ifyou’re concerned with covers, you may want to give these a chance before you go spend more cash unnecessarily.
Also in the box was an included sunshade. Some shooters prefer not to use a sunshade because of added length and bulk. I personally prefer to install a sunshade and leave it in place. I can’t count the number of times that other shooters in my squad were complaining about sun glare and trying to jerry-rig some kind of sunshade using a shemagh, hat, monkey’s paw, or anything else they could find in their pack to help them be able to see through their scopes again while facing into the sun. I had no issues with it and the sunshade provided has worked flawlessly. Also, aesthetically I feel the sunshade gives the optic a more pronounced tactical look that I like. It’s not a crime to have a little form with your gear’s function.
Operation
Functionally this scope absolutely holds zero very well. The zero has not shifted during the 10 months or so the optic has been used. The tracking is excellent as well. While no tall target testing was conducted to see if the reticle tracks to the millimeter, the elevation knobs were turned often- and any misses would have the wind to blame.Hitting steel tells me just as much or more than a tall target since I’m verifying ballistics in addition to checking if the turrets are tracking true. I always dial elevation unless I’m holding over on stages that don’t permit the time required to dial, or don’t permit dialing at all. I’ve competed in quite a few PRS-style matches, and not to mention all the practice I’ve done setting up my own stages and the reticle has always returned to zero and tracked reliably.
There are currently 2 reticle selections for the 5-25 version of the XTR II. The first is the G2B mil dot reticle with half mil hashes. The other two are both SCR reticles- one in MOA and one in MIL. The version I purchased is the SCR in mil. I currently prefer mils because of the lower number graduations and because most people in the sport of precision rifle shooting are using mils. It just makes it easier to spot for another shooter and help them with corrections if you are talking the same language and giving those corrections in the same measurements the shooter is observing through his/her optic.
Issues
Not everything is perfect with the XTR. I have heard small complaints from personal friends who also use the same scope in competition on various style rifles -the biggest being that when one turns the magnification ring to the highest magnification (somewhere after 20x mark) the picture becomes darker, and somewhat less clear. This is by no means a deal breaker for me, but it’s something that I see as a negative and feel needs to be mentioned. I can’t help but think that if the team at Burris could have alleviated this issue in the first place, they would have. But there seems to be something to be said for the quality of this piece at its price point. There may be some high end European glass that doesn’t darken at full magnification, but you sure won’t be paying an MSRP of $1450. You may actually have to get a second mortgage on your home, but I digress.
Also I had an issue with the illumination knob on this scope. It did work fine at first, but for whatever reason the illumination no longer works. I have no doubt that if I were to bring this to the attention of Burris they would fix it with no questions asked. However, my thinking is that I use the illumination option extremely sparingly. I think I may have needed to use it twice during the entire time I’ve used the optic. So I will most likely wait until the off-season to send the unit in for repairs. I was not too upset about the malfunction, as I have friends who have told me about illumination issues with high end US made optics, as well as German. As a farmer by day (and night, it seems), I know all equipment will fail you at one point or another.
For the most part, aside from the illumination issues, the XTR II has held up very well. I don’t mistreat my equipment, but I do use my gear as it needs to be used. In this case, it’s mostly in competition and in training on my own time. Going in and out of barricades, in sandy and dusty/dry conditions, in the rain (Sniper’s Hide Cup 2015, anyone?), being tipped onto the ground, you name it. It stays true to where you expect it to be.
Conclusions
Overall I have to say that the Burris XTR II 5-25 model has actually exceeded my expectations. I had been using more budget-friendly optics before I purchased the XTR II, and I had a feeling that this scope was going to be something I had to compromise with because of my non-European glass budget. This ended up not being the case. I have actually shot the best matches of my life so far using this scope, and I’ve been very pleased thus far.
I plan on continuing the use of this particular optic and in fact I will be testing another scope in the XTR II lineup soon. The 2-10 variant seems to be a scope that would be well suited for carbine use, and that’s exactly what I will be attaching it to. I have already paid entry to more than one team match for 2016, and will be testing the usefulness of the 2-10 in the roll of a precision carbine. Stay tuned to read more on that in late Summer 2016.
Author Justin Willhite